Market forces or party patronage?

Market forces or party patronage. These are the choices. It’s all very well complaining about the pricing structure for space at the SNP Conference, but what is the alternative? What criteria should be applied if not ability to pay? If the party is allocating specially reserved space, how does it avoid accusations of biased subjective judgement? How does it avoid even the perception of favouring organisations that are helpful to it politically? Or of ‘punishing’ organisations that have been unhelpful?

What is being demanded is that SNP members should subsidise external organisations. The SNP is not a charity. When people like myself give money or other resources to the party we do so for the purpose of supporting the aims of the SNP. We fund the party to fight elections and take forward the fight to restore Scotland’s independence. If I want to support this or that charity or campaigning organisation, then I will do so directly. The onus is on those charities of campaigning organisations to persuade me that I should support them – just as the SNP does.

Worthy as the aims and objectives of these external organisations may be, those are not necessarily or immediately the aims and objectives that I seek to progress by helping to fund the SNP. In principle, at least, these external organisation could have purposes that I would never choose to support. Why then should I condone resources that I have contributed being diverted to them?

Why is the SNP being held to a different standard? Why should the party’s ability to raise funds be constrained by considerations that don’t apply to other parties? Where are the demands that other parties subsidise external organisations – or be branded as ‘unethical’?

Who stands to benefit benefits from the financial hamstringing of the SNP being urged?

Whose agenda is served by the smear implicit in complaints about the pricing structure?

Ask the awkward questions!


About Peter A Bell

Thinker. Listener. Talker. Reader. Writer. None of my attitudes are immutable. None of my conclusions are final. None of my opinions are humble.
This entry was posted in Politics and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Market forces or party patronage?

  1. I hope they don’t allow the pro-Israel group a stand.


  2. A conference of any large political party takes much organisation, and apart from venue costs there is all the paperwork involved with delegates, observers and visitors. Publicity must be organised and an army of media folk catered for, sometimes along with high profile speakers form other parties or organisations. Catering has to be organised. Papers and passes for delegates. So many things that require funds before the party can make a small profit from the event. And why shouldn’t it?

    Money has to come from somewhere to finance elections. And all that is without what no conference can sadly be without nowadays – and that’s security. You only have to look at comments below the line on many websites to see how necessary that is to keep our FM and her team safe as well as all others attending. None of that comes cheap, unfortunately. Gone are the days of a few hundred attendees with a handful of amateurish stands mainly belonging to members. The party is in the big league now and that doesn’t come cheap. Hence the cost of space at the conference.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s