Majestically deluded

During the first referendum campaign, I identified something that I termed the Hassan-Riddoch Syndrome. A form of posturing pontification that offers little in the way of fresh insight or meaningful analysis but relies instead on an intellectually vacuous and tediously negative pseudo-critique spiced with the odd gobbet of laboriously contrived controversialism.

Many of you will recall how the Yes campaign was incessantly lectured by self-appointed arbiters of “proper debater” on how we were all talking to the wrong people about the wrongs things at the wrong time and in the wrong way. The sideline snipers are still at it. Regaling us with their distorted perceptions and their contrarian conclusions.

You know you’re dealing with some seriously puerile attention-seeking when you see a phrase such as “Age of the Imperial SNP“.

You know you’re about to be dealt some profoundly ill-informed, reality-denying drivel as soon as you see the majestically deluded reference to the SNP’s supposed “expectations about a landslide” in last week’s elections.

It doesn’t get any better as you go on. What Gerry Hassan offers is an account of the election and its outcome clumsily contorted to fit his rather sour regard for Scotland’s politics. We can safely disregard most of it and skip to the supremely shallow and magnificently misguided final paragraph.

Here, Gerry Hassan pompously decrees that “Scotland has to be about more than two competing claims of nationhood”, while revealing a stunning failure to comprehend the fact that those “two competing claims” definitively encompass the things he insists that the lack – or exclude. To imagine that political fault-lines in Scottish politics represent no more than a “debate between two nationalisms” is to disastrously fail to understand what these “nationalism” represent. It is to utterly miss the fact that they are shorthand for ideologies that go far beyond mere differing concepts of nationhood.

This simplistic appreciation of the new divide in Scottish politics fails to recognise the principles and ideas that are associated with what Hassan sees only as “two nationalisms”. It fails to recognise that they are indeed about “things both mundane and fundamental”.

The debate between pro- and anti-independence is, in reality, a debate between two very different concepts of society. Those campaigning for independence aren’t doing so solely for the sake of making Scotland an independent nation once again. They are fighting, not merely for independence, but for the potential and the promise that this entails. They are fighting for the opportunity to create a better, fairer, “more human and humane” society.

Those fighting to preserve the structures of power, privilege and patronage which define the British state are doing so from motives rather less worthy. They are either those who are served well by the old order and the old ways, or those who are made fearful by the insidious urgings of a ruling elite with vast resources at its disposal.

It’s not that Scotland has to be about two different claims of nationhood. Scotland already is about two different claims of what kind of nation it should be. What we saw in last week’s election was another stage in the process whereby the people of Scotland come to make choices between these competing claims.


About Peter A Bell

Thinker. Listener. Talker. Reader. Writer. None of my attitudes are immutable. None of my conclusions are final. None of my opinions are humble.
This entry was posted in Politics and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Majestically deluded

  1. says:

    Reblogged this on Bampots Utd.


  2. Benjamin says:

    Like this. Gerry Hassan especially. A lot of his writing is difficult to call analysis. More a competition to try and show how obscure he can get

    Liked by 1 person

  3. John Silver says:

    Wow! “intellectually vacuous; tediously negative; laboriously contrived: incessantly lectured: seriously puerile: profoundly ill-informed: majestically deluded: supremely shallow: magnificently misguided”
    Are you being paid by the adverb?
    Personally I found your piece disappointingly negative and spectacularly irrelevant.
    Just my opinion, naturally.


  4. Good piece, Peter. Putrid drivel from Hassan. It’s barely intelligible. How the f##k can he use the word imperial in relation to SNP? Everything about their style and policies is anti imperial, but as you say, attention seeking.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. daibhidhdeux says:

    Messrs Hassan and Riddoch – vacuous, pompous, wannabe, Holy Wullie know-it-alls rehashing the same auld tripe as if they and their arguments were perpetual motion machines to the point of blind tedium given their lack of intellectual rigour in the face of the electoral data.

    Small and Kevo W at Bella plus Ms Haggerty and her Common Space teamsters, another shower of hand-wringing, back-stabbing Pharisees pontificating – in their case – from their self-appointed, Trotskyite-faux anarchist, infiltrationist tactic of hijacking another but core mass, Scots democratic movement pulpits. Self anointed.

    False friends, all.

    Ultimately a good and cleansing thing this Holyrood latest election where they flushed themselves out for what they are and are not.

    Mirror images of outright Unionists along the lines of David Torrance and the foaming-mouthed Cochers and Massie, but mair luvvie, passive-aggressive sleekit.

    Rabid beasties posing as timorous in the case of the former (including Torrance). Whereas, Cochrane and Massie are outrightly deadhead, snarling Yoonionistas with teeth fully bared. The other pack seem to be snapping with sly eyes slyly sneaking a peek as they nip and claw and give comfort and aid to the British state, too.

    Not, ultimately, any of them, to any point in the greater scale of democratic, human struggle as expressed in Scotland, in this case.

    Irrelevancies, in other words, already cast in to the dustbin of history as the citizens of Scotland move on to their goal of restoring their ancient sovereignty and the democratic defining of our body politic.

    Essentially and therefore, and with PC apologies made in advance, fuck them all.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s